12 Comments
User's avatar
Michael Smith's avatar

Some of these judges, and the lawyers urging them on, appear to be engaging in interference with the peaceful transfer of power. I forget what the word for that is.

Expand full comment
Bonnie Ramthun's avatar

I'd give up my right to vote in a heartbeat. I'm not a typical college educated woman, since I have a computer science degree. Without rigorous logic, computer programs do not work. Therefore I do not vote based on emotion, but on logic and facts.

I'll give up my precious right to vote if we can stop these illogical and emotional women from destroying our country. I was told years ago by a woman voter that she thought Clinton was handsome so she was going to vote for him. I was ready to give up my right to vote then. More so now.

Expand full comment
JasonT's avatar

It there was such a thing as group shame, I would really feel for you. It appears you are in a very dofferent group. Cheers.

Expand full comment
RAM's avatar

The college experience (outside of hard sciences) isn't doing much for white women other than creating a totally false perspective. This has been true for decades now.

Expand full comment
JasonT's avatar

White women used to go to college to get an MRS degree. Now they go to college to learn to hate everything, including themselves and become unemployable with government assistance. The demise of USAID is going to be particularly painful for them

Expand full comment
RAM's avatar

Academia is the citadel of family-unfriendly feminism.

Expand full comment
Rascal Nick Of's avatar

Winning? I have not yet begun to tire of it!

But seriously, for Democrats, hypocrisy and gaslighting are strategies. They are resentful, and miserable by nature. The only thing that brings them satisfaction is making joyful people miserable. Peace, love, and joy are your best defense against them! Hate has no home here! (My wife agrees with Lucretia…shh)

Expand full comment
Tim Hurlocker's avatar

Trump must defend the powers of the presidency by ignoring lower court national injunctions, and all injunctions against his powers as Commander in Chief. Trump doesn't need Congress to approve his actions either, so impeaching Boasberg is a secondary issue. Judicial review is not the same thing as judicial pre-approval.

Expand full comment
L. E. Joiner's avatar

Only a couple of weeks ago, you'd have posted this on PowerLine. Do you really think you'll have more readers here?

Expand full comment
Michael Smith's avatar

I was a regular Powerline commenter till it banned me a year ago for some soporific word (mis)use I can't even remember. I think the 12 year old censor was on duty that morning instead of his 16 year old brother.

PL also had never Trump tendencies, though never from Prof. Heyward.

This platform is a +1 by me.

Expand full comment
Christopher B's avatar

Since he is a college professor, published author, regular participant in national and international conferences, and frequent guest host on the flagship Ricochet podcast, I don't think Mr Hayward is hurting for an audience. I have sensed that ever since the dust-up with he who shall not be named at Powerline Mr Hayward has been seeking a platform over which he had more editorial control. I've also sensed that Powerline is taking a turn to be much more of the online vehicle for John Hinderaker's American Experiment organization than it has been in the past, especially since he recently announced a former AE staffer is now going to be a regular contributor there. I suspect Powerline may become a bit more Minnesota-centric as a result. Just my tuppence of course but I personally have been happy to see Mr Hayward getting more publishing freedom.

Expand full comment
L. E. Joiner's avatar

I was not questioning Steve's motives, but just surmising that for newsy posts like this one, PowerLine's established readership (and Hayward fan base) would reach more readers than here in the Substack hinterlands.

Expand full comment