Discussion about this post

User's avatar
TonyP173's avatar

Max, you make commenting on your columns difficult for me since they are so interesting, detailed, well-researched, superbly written, and compelling. These columns are so different from your brilliant novels, which are no less well written, but fill a very different niche. .

You are, in fact, a man of many parts. An intellectual Paladin, if you will.

I am roughly the same age as you, so I was exposed to the same TV fare of the 50s. "Have Gun Will Travel" was on my watch list, but it was not my favorite. Frankly, I'd be hard pressed to tell you which Horse Opera was. I tried to watch some episodes of every one of them.

Growing up in the Southwest, I was a little off put, because the TV fare was so out of sync with what I knew to be the reality of actual life in the west. For example, no real western character ever dressed like, Paladin, Bret Maverick, Cheyenne, or any of the Magnificent Seven.

If it's any consolation, since I am a retired Paratrooper, I drive folks mad with my running critiques of the inaccuracies of the war movies that were made before Captain Dale Dye showed up to become the technical advisor on various movies and mini-series. Band of Brothers and The Pacific are just two examples of his influence.

I think that I'm most enamored of the portion of this week's column that addresses the issue of what underlying 'motive,' 'lesson," or 'meaning' an author inserted for the benefit of literature professors, teachers, and/or critics. You obviously understand that the intellectual class could not simply accept that a story teller had no hidden agenda to be detected by the reader in order to teach the reader some great truth.

At Brophy Prep, that Jesuit school on Central Ave. in Phoenix, we studied literature all four years. According to the Jesuit fathers who assigned vast numbers of novels and classical works, there was always a lesson to be learned. They ignored the express declaimers that you published this morning from Hemingway and Twain.

Though I did receive a substantial foundation at Brophy, which helped me navigate literature course at Arizona State (happily, NOT, the Harvard of the Southwest), I found the search for deep, hidden meaning in a good story to be tedious and counter-productive.

My favorite novel of my youth was "Catch 22." I haven't done the research to quote Joseph Heller accurately this morning, but, I recall that he described one of his characters in the novel as an arrogant, pseudo intellectual, who 'knew everything about literature, except how to enjoy it.' [Not verbatim, obviously].

My favorite Western Movie was/is/always will be "The Professionals." If you are looking for the hidden meaning, there is a dialogue between Burt Lancaster and Jack Palance that was brutally frank and very compelling to a college student about to go to war. There was no 'hidden' meaning, the writers laid it out for anyone to see.

Expand full comment
Unwoke in Idaho's avatar

How fascinating. It’s doubtful many of the writers of TV shows today know anything more than the formulas which have even become bastardized from a few decades ago. Take Law and Order. It used to be great. Today and for the last ten years it’s unwatchable.

And most shows include the inevitable car or foot chase and gratuitous sex scenes. Boring.

Expand full comment
43 more comments...

No posts